change.org petition

歡迎

亞太減少煙草危害倡導者聯盟(CAPHRA)是減少煙草危害倡導者聯盟及其各自組織的聯盟。我們的使命和目標是教育,倡導和代表成年尼古丁替代品消費者獲得和使用減少煙草使用危害的產品的權利。

我們沒有資金和基層。我們所有成員都通過為各自國家的消費者進行討論,支持和指導而進行協作,並共同作為亞太地區的代表消費者的聲音。

如果您是第一次找到我們,請花一些時間環顧四周,以了解我們的工作以及為什麼要做我們的工作。如果您有任何建議或意見, 請在這裡與我們聯繫。

WHO WE ARE

與一些全球領先的THR專家和擁護者進行自我更新,他們可以自由分享他們的知識和專業知識。

Marking the 30th anniversary of the Smoke-free Environments Act with Helen Clark and Holly Walker

LATEST VIDEO PRESENTATIONS

SOCIAL MEDIA

6,582
CAPHRAorg

卡帕格

CAPHRA is the THR Consumer Advocacy Coalition for Asia Pacific, representing the interests of over 1 million smokers and users of SNP. Founded in 2018. Our Mission: Educate, Mentor, Advise and Represent users of safer nicotine products (SNP)

15.05.21

World War 3 - Our #Health is not for sale. #Right2Switch . Right. Read, Sign, Discuss &Share: www.change.org/v4v-petition https://bit.ly/2PWN02m ... 查看更多少看
在Facebook上查看

13.05.21

World War 3 - Tobacco Control and Colonisation. Our #Health is not for sale. #Right2Switch . Right. Read, Sign, Discuss &Share: www.change.org/v4v-petitionhttps://bit.ly/2Q1pXDi ... 查看更多少看
在Facebook上查看

13.05.21

FYI -THE MORE YOU KNOW: Nicotine gum was created as "a tobacco substitute for oral use" with "suitable doses of nicotine" to "prevent the user from being exposed to the many harmful constituents of tobacco smoke," and one of the first flavors was chocolate/mocha. Sound familiar? Read on for an interesting and very relevant backstory of the invention of nicotine gum (as a smoking harm reduction product!)----Ove Fernö, inventor nicotine gum, created it NOT as a nicotine "addiction" therapy, but as "a tobacco substitute for oral use" with "suitable doses of nicotine" which would "prevent the user from being exposed to the many harmful constituents of tobacco smoke."His first idea was to use an aerosol containing nicotine, but "it tasted terrible" and "was too complicated."The idea for gum came from submariners who couldn't smoke on their ship, so found smoke-free tobacco to be an effective substitute.In 1969, after using the nicotine gum to quit smoking, he didn't stop chewing the nicotine gum until "after one year or so." So, the gum REPLACED smoking for him for a significant period.When he made the first measurements in 1972 in people using gum, cigarettes and snuff, he "discovered that the absorption of nicotine was poor when compared with the absorption from cigarettes and snuff" and set out to improve absorption by increasing the pH of saliva.He stated, "One of the first flavours was a mocha taste. The taste is important because nicotine has a very strong taste and it has to be masked in some way."However, marketing the nicotine gum was problematic. Clinicians and scientists in the medical field, including several university professors, "warned that nicotine gum could be looked upon as unethical by the medical profession."Tobacco control organizations "over emphasized the risk of nonsmokers, including children, becoming addicted to nicotine from the gum." However, "all this changed during the late 1970s, particularly after the publications from Michael Russell and his group."Michael Russell, a psychiatrist and research scientist, was a pioneer in the study of tobacco dependence and the development of treatments to help smokers quit. He is often quoted as stating, "People smoke for nicotine, but they die from the tar."Ironically, Ove's home country of Sweden--even with successful clinical trials--ruled that nicotine gum was neither a drug treatment nor a "foodstuff," an "impossible situation" that required his clinics to stop giving away the gum to help people quit smoking.Researchers, clinics and advocates presented their case to the Tobacco Committee of the Ministry of Social Affairs, describing their experiences with the gum since 1970 with literally thousands of patients. This led to the gum being classified as a drug.How did the gum come to be called "Nicorette"? Ove explained, "It means roughly, nicotine (Nico) delivered in the right (rette) way."When asked if nasal nicotine spray would "continue addiction," because it more effectively delivered nicotine, he pointed out "Perhaps, but there are indications that NNS is particularly helpful for heavy smokers. If they did then have difficulty giving up NNS they could perhaps switch to the gum or the patch for a while. Don't forget that the pharmacokinetics of nicotine absorption are very different from smoking and chewing gum, much slower with the gum. I'm sure this is why it is very easy for most people on the gum to give it up."In conclusion, he said "People in the [anti] smoking field have slowly but gradually accepted the idea. I think that in some sense the time was right. Psychological methods had been tried for years with only limited success so that the time was right for something new."----It's important to note that, if not for the risks of harm from inhaling smoke, no one would have cared about nicotine "addiction" anymore than they care about caffeine "addiction." NRT was created as HARM REDUCTION. To quote Ove Fernö, maybe the time is again "right for something new."Read full interview: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb03300.x ... 查看更多少看
在Facebook上查看

Vapers感言

我嘗試了+40年的吸煙期間中的所有事情以停止吸煙!沒有一個對我有用!有了Vape就像在公園裡散步一樣!它是在不到4天的時間內自行產生的,我不再喜歡可燃香煙的味道和氣味!而且永遠也不會回到香煙上!

奧列·弗雷德里克森

如果被禁止,我會使用跨界或黑市。僅僅因為有些人不懂電子煙或容易受到大企業的歡迎,我不打算再吸煙來自殺。

大衛·莫格

我從13歲開始吸煙和吸煙。我每天抽2盒煙。我從2015年7月開始開始吸煙。有了vape,我的吸煙量從每天2盒減少到每天半盒……&3個月後我停止吸煙了……我希望人們可以選擇除香煙以外的其他選擇。

謝罕·雷扎·薩利姆(Shehan Reza M.Sallim)

我從沒想過我會停止吸煙,但是嘗試了霧化,發現我更喜歡它。各種各樣的設備和液體使它很有趣,所以我什至不需要香煙。我喜歡不時抽煙,而不是為尼古丁而煩惱。

安·P

Vaping可以挽救生命。如果不是最好的方法,那將比抽煙更好。請不要放棄我們選擇健康替代品的權利。

Sanib Ghai

當我在Vaping的幫助下戒菸時,Vaping是我的生命線,現在感覺好多了。如果禁止吸煙,恐怕我將無法抵抗尼古丁的衝動,並且會開始吸煙,這是我不希望的。

賈漢澤布·伊克巴爾

我從很小的時候就開始吸煙,並且多年以來都無法戒菸。 Vaping結束了我對香煙的癮,讓我感覺更健康。

安瑪德

我不使用電子煙,但我相信每個人都有使用香煙替代品的權利

Zeph週

在歐洲,電子煙已經得到了合理的監管,現在已經被過度監管。就有效和有效的霧化而言,過度監管將無助於消除霧化,並將剩餘的一切移交給煙草公司。這將意味著巨大的倒退,而改變公共衛生的進步潛力將喪失……。但這絕關乎健康,而關乎金錢。

蘇·史密斯

為什麼禁止吸煙替代健康方法?是否是因為ITC等捲菸銷售商進行了大規模遊說?
煙草更有害,禁止吸煙如何?

巴拉斯

印度

我抽煙已經15年了,我終於改用電子煙了,它比抽煙要健康得多。我這樣做不是為了娛樂,而是為了遏制我對尼古丁的渴望。請不要在沒有任何實質性證據證明vaping與吸煙一樣或比吸煙更糟的情況下禁止vaping

車丹

印度

我曾經抽一包煙!使用尼古丁貼片和口香糖嘗試過沒有任何幫助。自從開始吸煙以來,我一直抽著煙,我的健康得到了很大程度的改善!

哈格迪什

印度

這種事情可以挽救生命。但是像往常一樣,由於既得利益而被阻止。在全世界都知道吸煙的危害的情況下,如何才能將煙草中的尼古丁比起消除95%危害的霧化法更好地出售。

Mactrlk

印度

Vaping可以挽救生命。如果不是最好的方法,那將比抽煙更好。請不要放棄我們選擇健康替代品的權利。

薩希卜

印度

曾經抽煙17年,抽煙幫助我戒掉了這個習慣。我已經無菸了2年了,很快就會戒菸了。 Vaping減少了我對尼古丁的渴望,我計劃在2年內退出(我已經開始使用低強度的nic)

賽義德

印度

Global Deaths Since 2000

Smoking

141,238,977

霧化

0

 

 

 

你夠大嗎? 請單擊Enter確認您在您所在國家的法定年齡。或單擊退出離開。
zh_HKChinese (Hong Kong)